Vegan Landlord In NYC Has Been Banning Tenants From Cooking Meat Since 2007
A vegan landlord in NYC has been banning tenants from cooking meat since 2007. This landlord, who follows a strict vegan lifestyle, has been banning tenants from cooking meat in their rental units. The unique policy has attracted media attention, generating discussions about the boundaries of landlord requirements and the rights of tenants.
The New York Timesreported that two one-bedroom apartments in Brooklyn listed by a vegan landlord will require tenants to abstain from cooking meat in order to reside there.
According to the Times, which discovered the unusual request on nextdoor.com before it was withdrawn, the listing included a "no meat/fish in the building" restriction.
The Times reported, however, that the $4,500-and $5,750-per-month apartments could still accommodate meat consumers; they just couldn't cook meat there. According to the source, building broker Andrea Kelly conveyed this to a prospective tenant.
Kelly told the Times, according to a report:
“„It's not vegetarian-only, but the owner lives in the building and doesn't want the smell of cooking meat drifting upstairs,- Andrea Kelly
A source familiar with the building confirmed this to Insider, explaining that the meat-cooking prohibition was enacted because the scent of cooking meat permeated the smaller building, which had adequate but not "amazing" ventilation.
Vegan landlord in NYC has been banning tenants from cooking meat since 2007. All prospective tenants are made aware of the prohibition on cooking meat before signing a lease agreement.
The clause explicitly states that cooking or preparing any form of meat, including fish, poultry, and red meat, is strictly prohibited within the rental units. Violation of this policy can result in warnings, fines, or even eviction, depending on the severity of the offense.
The vegan landlord's ban on cooking meat can be seen as an extension of their personal ethics. Vegans typically avoid consuming animal products due to concerns about animal welfare, environmental impact, and personal health.
By extending this philosophy to the properties they own, the landlord aims to create a living environment consistent with their beliefs. They argue that banning meat cooking reduces the presence of animal byproducts, odors, and potential cross-contamination in the building.
Conclusion
A vegan landlord in NYC has been banning tenants from cooking meat since 2007. This has generated significant attention and debate. While some tenants appreciate living in an environment that aligns with their dietary choices, others argue that the ban infringes upon their personal freedom and dietary preferences.
The case highlights the complexities of landlord requirements and the intersection between personal beliefs, property rights, and individual liberties. As the discussion continues, it remains to be seen how such policies will be addressed within the legal framework and whether compromises can be reached to accommodate diverse lifestyles.