Trans Woman Who Sued Salon Workers For Refusing To Wax Her Testicles Loses Court Cases
A trans woman who Sued Salon workers for refusing to wax her testicles loses court cases. A few months ago, Jessica Yaniv, a transgender woman from Canada, garnered attention by filing human rights complaints against multiple waxing and aesthetic salon workers. Discover all the case here.
A few months ago, Jessica Yaniv, a transgender woman from Canada, garnered attention by filing human rights complaints against multiple waxing and aesthetic salon workers. She accused them of transphobic discrimination for refusing to perform pubic hair removal procedures on her scrotum, claiming it was a form of discriminatory denial.
However, recent developments reveal that Yaniv has lost every one of her cases as the tribunal rejected her claims. The decision emphasized that human rights legislation does not mandate service providers to wax genitals they are not trained for and have not consented to wax.
The tribunal further asserted that Yaniv had engaged in improper conduct, filing complaints for improper purposes. It concluded that her testimony was disingenuous and self-serving, noting evasiveness and contradictions during her evidence presentation.
As a consequence of the tribunal's decision, Yaniv is now required to compensate the salon workers, and one of them was forced out of business due to the ramifications of Yaniv's claim.
Several salon workers cited religious objections to carrying out the procedures, while others argued that they lacked appropriate training in waxing a scrotum. The tribunal recognized that some of the salons in question had never offered services for waxing scrotums, making it unjustifiable to accuse them of discrimination against Yaniv.
In its verdict, the tribunal reiterated, "Human rights legislation does not require a service provider to wax a type of genitals they are not trained for and have not consented to wax."
In the context of Yaniv's case, several human rights treaties are relevant, emphasizing the principles of non-discrimination, privacy, and the right to access goods and services without facing discrimination based on gender identity or expression.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR):Yaniv's case touches upon the UDHR's principles of equality, non-discrimination, and the right to privacy, which are foundational in human rights law.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR):The ICCPR protects individuals from discrimination based on various grounds, including gender identity. It upholds the right to privacy and non-discrimination in the enjoyment of civil and political rights.
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR):The ICESCR highlights the right to work and the right to enjoy just and favorable conditions of work, which encompasses protection from discrimination in employment and service provision.
Jessica yaniv selfie
The ruling also criticized Yaniv for targeting small businesses, creating conditions for a human rights complaint, and leveraging that complaint to pursue financial settlements from parties deemed unsophisticated and unlikely to mount a proper defense.
The entire case has been deemed peculiar and has sparked discussions about the balance between individual rights and service providers' prerogatives.